Time and spirited negotiations happen on internet fora pertaining to a examination of the status of a number of jyotish parameters( such as chara dasha (a sign based planetary period astrofactor) and also karakamsha (the navamsha in which the atmakaraka (most advanced planet in longitude) is set. As characteristically happens, several of the discussants began to branch into other negative discussions that really had nothing more related to all the first questions or issues and some even became a little resolved and emotional, as also frequently happens on the internet where attention spans of days and weeks are demanded to be able to get into the underside of matters and where sometimes an interest will be discussed on many unique boards and many issues simultaneously on a particular board! As too is typical, nothing has been resolved, and a few of the regulars began expressing their insecurities concerning those issues coming up again and again and directing people to writings . Unfortunately, the ya-hoo forums/fora are such that just limited hunting of previous messages is possible without losing all of one's hair, and also the archives are often kept on yet another yahoo site therefore that this will not help matters when everybody wants is to get yourself a quick summary of what the others are already using and when possible their reasons for embracing a certain location! This latter brings forth more gall than good information even though the aim of the person posing the question may have been very commendable and not in any way confrontational. Knowing Jyotish doesn't protect one from harbouring Neurotic faculties!
Somewhere, along the path of this former pursuit, another issue got endured and began questioning the usage of varga kundalis or even varga chakras, divisional horoscopes that are the center of jyotish and have been used by tropical astrologers in the form of harmonic charts. This really is something which is employed in Jyotish going back to almost the very first memories of even the earliest members at the discussion who finally confessed to this kind of case. I myself, even though myself maybe not that senior, have experienced horoscopes that were drawn from the century before where the jyotishi had drawn the rashi chakra and navamsha along with dashamsha and therefore on and much more importantly had commented on these charts in his own reading. kalyan panel chart Therefore, at least a lot of people had been utilizing varga-charts a handful of hundred years ago and conceivably perhaps even just before those times.
Somewhere during the discussion, in another of these lists, one of those members left available a post in which the writer had expressed notions to the contrary, i.e., vargas should not be utilised in a chart format. A conversation ensued which side stepped the important and pertinent matter of the technical virtues of utilizing navamsha varga like an secondary chart. A few individuals asked for proofs in classics which indicates that ancient jyotishis urged of varga chakras. The discussants highlighted that ONLY rashi chakra has to be properly used along with varga placements should only be used for ascertaining the features of planets etc..
One of those associates brought to all astrologers' attention that Parashara had clarified very clearly how exactly to find out bhavas in the rashi graph (ascendant, 10th dwelling and trisection of their arcs, etc. . V of BPHS). This was really true and a positive step forward in the conversation. There were parallel discussions going on which were rehashing that BPHS was not original and was perhaps not even a timeless and written by one or even a set of'latterday saints' [my term, not the initial poster's!] In Jyotish and therefore can't be treated like a classic. Apparently, there is some support for this could possibly be similarly expected if someone should happen to make a comment that Jyotish was nothing but a derivative of Babylonian astrology that the army that came with Alexander brought to India. A topic that's been recognized to attract even untoward jyotishis out on the"warpath!"
To individuals who were interested and intrigued by thisparticular, there appeared to be two streams of thought prevailing:
(a) Only Rashi horoscopes ought to be used. Other varga kundalis would be the item of corrupt understanding of the classics which themselves many agree might not have endured in pristine form [though a number of these have thankfully lived in pretty great shape1]. Underlying this is the view some could harbor that, equally the breeze, available Jyotish is only 1/10th of their entire human body while the submerged 9/10th is mostly lost and partially hidden in the secret chambers of paramparas and some of the secret documents which you can get nevertheless jealously guarded by the custodian families. I don't know just how much with this iceberg postulate is established data and how much is wishful fiction. According to the purists with the particular stream of thought, vargas MUST only be applied as measures of quantitative and qualitative strength of planets and also because of that consideration of the deities and primal forces those represent although maybe not in the form of a horoscope and certainly no significant consideration must be directed at aspects and bhava considerations. Just for clarity, they would assert, for instance, that while the 2nd dwelling lord in navamsha is a significant index, the fact that it is placed in the next navamsha varga from the navamsha lagna (essentially in second house in navamsha graph ) isn't important. Or, for example, when Mars is in Aries sign and Libra navamsha, and Saturn is in Gemini sign and Libra navamsha, both planets aren't related (though they'd be depicted as being conjoined in exactly the same navamsha varga in a navamsha chart).
(b) Irrespective of if specifically clarified or not, one other flow of thinking maintains that varga kundalis have an important function to play in Jyotish and possibly are of significant usefulness in discerning chief mandates matters pertaining to the prescription written by sages. In other words, navamsha graph, for example, would hold significant sway within matters of spouse and marriage, while saptamsha chart would be of similar import in the study of children in a specific nativity's reading. All these Vargas should be examined in a graph format.
In fact, most of them utilized theories from both (a) and (b) streams. There appeared to be some different people who entirely denied that the veracity of idea flow (b) and a few were a bit taciturn about any of this, perhaps in order to prevent acrimony and getting ensnared from the controversy. Or perhaps there were several other causes, known only for them.